Quality assurance & testing
We break things before your users do
Our QA and software testing services — automated, manual, and everything in between — make sure your product behaves like it should.
Where coverage should go
- Payments & authNear-total
- Core user flowsHigh
- Admin & reportingModerate
- Static contentThin, deliberately
Chasing a single coverage number is how suites get slow and then ignored.
You had a problem. Now you don't.
Before
Every bug a user finds costs more than the same bug found in CI — in support time, in trust, and in the release you have to rush out on a Friday. Most teams know this and still ship without a safety net, because building one competes with shipping features.
After
We build the net. Automated coverage where it pays for itself, manual testing where judgement is required, and a pipeline that blocks the regression rather than reporting it after the fact.
What we do
Test automation
End-to-end, integration, and API suites that run on every commit and are stable enough that a red build means something.
- Cypress and Playwright
- API contract tests
- CI integration
Manual and exploratory testing
The testing automation cannot do: judgement about whether a flow makes sense, and the deliberate hunt for what nobody thought to specify.
Mobile device testing
Real devices, real OS versions, real network conditions — including the older Android your analytics say a third of your users are on.
Performance and load testing
What happens at ten times the traffic, found before the campaign rather than during it, with the bottleneck named.
Accessibility testing
Keyboard paths, screen-reader semantics, and contrast checked against WCAG — automated where it can be, by hand where it must be.
QA process and strategy
Where to spend testing effort, what to automate first, and how to make quality a gate in the pipeline rather than a stage at the end.
How it works
- 01
Assess
What is covered, what is not, and where your bugs actually come from. Escaped-defect history is the most useful document nobody reads.
- 02
Prioritise by risk
Coverage aimed at the flows where failure costs most — payment, auth, data integrity — rather than at a coverage percentage.
- 03
Automate the regression path
The suite that runs on every commit, kept fast and kept trustworthy. A flaky test that gets ignored is worse than no test.
- 04
Test what needs a human
Exploratory passes on new work, on real devices, by people who are trying to break it.
- 05
Gate the pipeline
Quality checks that block a release rather than filing a report about one, with the results visible to everyone.
Don't take our word for it
Blink22 is building out critical features for a set of native iOS/Android apps. They focus on writing clean, scalable code from given design specs in addition to QA testing and bug fixes. Our efficiency in development time has improved significantly since working with Blink22.
The application is excellent, outperforming the existing iOS version and demonstrating the high quality of the code they produced. The team is proactive, taking the initiative to work quickly, respond fast, and work effectively at all times.
What we test with
Automation
Cypress · Playwright · Appium · Jest
Performance
k6 · JMeter · Lighthouse
Devices
Real device labs · BrowserStack · iOS and Android matrices
Pipeline
GitHub Actions · Sentry · OpenReplay
Stuff you'd normally have to email us about
Both, aimed at different things. Automation owns the regression path — the same checks, every commit, faster than a person. Manual owns judgement and exploration, which is where the interesting bugs live. A team doing only one of the two is paying for the other in escaped defects.
No, and chasing it is how suites become slow and ignored. We aim coverage at the flows where failure is expensive, and deliberately leave cheap-to-fix surfaces thinner.
Yes. We usually start by making the existing suite trustworthy, because a flaky suite that everyone re-runs until it passes is providing no safety at all.
Yes — automated checks for what tooling catches reliably, plus manual keyboard and screen-reader passes for the roughly half of WCAG that no tool can assess.
Ready to stop finding bugs in production?
Tell us what keeps breaking. We'll tell you what it would take to catch it first.
Talk to us about QA