Sitecore development
Enterprise platforms without the headaches
We build, optimise, and customise Sitecore experiences that don't require a full team just to maintain.
You had a problem. Now you don't.
Before
Sitecore is powerful, and that is exactly how it goes wrong. Implementations accumulate custom code nobody owns, editors stop trusting the page editor, and every release needs a specialist who left two years ago.
After
We build Sitecore the way it is meant to be built — components editors can actually compose, upgrades that are routine, and a codebase your own team can maintain without a dedicated Sitecore practice.
What we do
New implementations
Greenfield Sitecore builds on XM Cloud or the platform you have standardised on, with a component library your content team can compose without a ticket.
- XM Cloud
- Headless with Next.js
- Component-first information architecture
Upgrades and migrations
Off an unsupported version, or out of a monolith into headless. Planned in stages so the site stays live and the risk stays bounded.
- Version upgrades
- Monolith to headless
- Content migration with validation
Optimisation and rescue
An implementation that is slow, fragile, or unusable for editors. We audit it, tell you honestly what is worth keeping, and fix the parts that pay for themselves.
- Performance audit
- Editor experience repair
- Custom-code reduction
Ongoing Sitecore support
A team that knows your implementation, so an upgrade or a new campaign template does not require rebuilding institutional knowledge first.
How it works
- 01
Audit
We inventory what exists — templates, components, custom code, integrations — and separate what is load-bearing from what is left over.
- 02
Plan in stages
A route that keeps the current site serving traffic throughout, with each stage independently shippable and reversible.
- 03
Build the component library
Composable components with real authoring affordances, so editors build pages instead of requesting them.
- 04
Migrate and validate
Content moved with automated comparison of before and after, because a migration that silently drops fields is worse than one that fails loudly.
- 05
Hand over properly
Documentation, editor training, and a codebase deliberately shaped so your team can own it.
Getting off a legacy Sitecore
Audit
What exists, and what is load-bearing.
Headless front end
New front end against the existing content.
Content migration
Moved, then compared field by field.
XM Cloud cutover
Staged, with a rollback at every step.
Client Testimonials
Verified reviews from our clients on Clutch.
Within 60 days of launch, the app ranked #9 on all categories combined and #1 in the Business category in the App Store with over 250,000 installs. Developers at Blink22 were highly-proficient, handling all difficult integrations with grace and friendliness.
Blink22 has helped to improve development capabilities. They hold themselves to high standards, which has enabled successful collaboration. Upon joining the engineering board, they have augmented resources to help execute the platform.
Thanks to Blink22, the company expedited the delivery of their key projects and accelerated the integration of new payment methods. The team's flexibility, agility, and structured way of working made the process seamless.
Sami LoualiFormer EVP, Jumia Group
They delivered everything perfectly on time, and their response rate was exceptional — usually within minutes through any channel of communication. What impressed us most was their commitment and highly competent team. Everything was perfect.
The communication has been exceptional. We have worked with other teams in the past, and Blink has been far superior. They meet deadlines, communicate well, and are kind and easy to work with!
Rex DuvalCo-Founder & CEO, Nookly
The quality of the product was a testament to how well the team works, it was such a short period of time but they were able to achieve amazing results. The team is very agile, punctual and extremely professional.
Mariam Al MarriFounder, Boom
What we work with
Sitecore
XM Cloud · Sitecore XP · Sitecore XM · Content Hub
Headless
Next.js · Sitecore JSS · GraphQL
Platform
.NET · Azure · SQL Server · Solr
Stuff you'd normally have to email us about
Usually yes, eventually — the hosting and upgrade burden largely goes away. Whether it is right now depends on your integrations and your licence position, and the audit answers that with numbers rather than a recommendation in the abstract.
Yes, and it is a good part of what we do. We start with an audit so we can tell you what is salvageable before either of us commits to a plan.
Some, and less than you expect if the component library is built properly. Training is part of handover, not an extra.
Yes. That constraint shapes the plan from the start — staged cutover, parallel running, and a documented rollback at every stage.
Latest from the blog
Ready to make Sitecore boring?
Tell us what your implementation is doing to you. We'll tell you what it takes to fix.
Book an implementation audit